JPEG vs PNG: Which Format Should You Choose?
JPEG and PNG are the two most widely used image formats on the web, with a combined history stretching back over 25 years. Yet many developers and content creators use them interchangeably, not realising that this choice can double or triple the weight of their pages. Here is everything you need to know to choose correctly.
The fundamental technical difference
The most important difference between JPEG and PNG comes down to how they compress data:
- JPEG uses lossy compression: when you save a JPEG, data is permanently discarded. The algorithm exploits the limits of human visual perception to eliminate the least visible details. Every time you re-save a JPEG, quality degrades slightly.
- PNG uses lossless compression: every pixel of the original image is preserved with perfect fidelity. You can open, edit, and re-save a PNG file indefinitely without any quality loss.
This fundamental difference is why the two formats have distinct domains of application.
JPEG vs PNG: comparison table (8 criteria)
| Criterion | JPEG | PNG |
|---|---|---|
| Compression type | Lossy | Lossless |
| Transparency | No | Yes (alpha channel) |
| Animation | No | No (APNG extension only) |
| Colour depth | 24-bit (16.7 M colours) | 8, 24, or 32-bit |
| File size for photos | Very small | Very large |
| File size for graphics | Medium (artifacts) | Small to medium |
| Quality loss on re-save | Yes | No |
| Browser compatibility | 100% | 100% |
When to use JPEG
JPEG is the format of choice for anything photographic. Its strengths shine in these contexts:
- Product photos on an e-commerce site
- Portraits and people photography
- Images with many gradients: landscapes, skies, natural textures
- Hero/banner images where file size is critical
- Images shared on social media platforms that apply their own compression anyway
A 3 MB photo saved as PNG can drop to 200–400 KB as a good-quality JPEG (80/100), a factor of 7 to 15 with no perceptible degradation.
When to use PNG
PNG is irreplaceable as soon as any of these conditions apply:
- Transparency is required: a logo on a coloured background, an icon with rounded corners, or an element overlaid on an image
- The image contains text or sharp edges: JPEG's lossy compression blurs contours and can make text unreadable
- Screenshots: UI elements (buttons, menus) are better preserved in PNG
- Computer-generated graphics with flat colour areas (diagrams, infographics)
- Images that will be edited further: always work in PNG and export to JPEG only at the very end
Practical tips by use case
E-commerce website
Use JPEG for product photos and PNG for logos and pictograms that appear on white or coloured backgrounds. If your CMS supports it, enable automatic WebP conversion for the best of all worlds.
Portfolio or showcase website
Background images and photo galleries → JPEG or WebP. Logo, navigation icons, graphic elements → PNG or SVG.
Social media
Most platforms re-compress images anyway. Share photos as high-quality JPEG (90+) to limit double compression. For visuals containing text (quotes, infographics), prefer PNG to keep text sharp.
WebP: the modern alternative that beats both
If you have freedom to choose your format in 2026, WebP is the superior replacement for both JPEG and PNG in the vast majority of cases: it offers 25–35% smaller files than JPEG, supports transparency like PNG, and is supported by 97% of browsers. The JPEG vs PNG debate becomes secondary once you adopt WebP in your workflow.
Try imgpact tools
Free browser-based image tools, no upload, no signup.